Criticism of energy policy and RES: Doubts have been raised about the promotion of renewable energy sources (RES), including windmills, as a source of "cheap" and cost-effective solutions, especially in the context of subsidy phase-outs and wind farm closures in countries such as Denmark, Germany and Sweden. It has been pointed out that the overabundance of these sources (so-called overwatering) can lead to the risk of blackouts, using Spain as an example . Fraud in a prestigious scientific report: A "scientific scam" related to a report by the Potsdam Institute for Climate Research, published in the journal Nature, that said economies were collapsing due to CO2 emissions, was discussed. Researchers at Stanford University later revealed that the report contained fraud, faulty data and methodology. Despite negative reviews from 75% of reviewers, the report's authors changed the data and methodology to get the same results . Impact of fraudulent report: Highlighted the scandalous fact that this flawed report was the second most cited last year and formed the basis for the actions of key global institutions (OECD, World Bank, European Central Bank, Grok climate agreement) and numerous Polish institutions and universities . No experimental evidence of heating by CO2: The basic doctrine justifying the introduction of RES is the thesis that CO2 emitted by fossil fuels warms the atmosphere . It has been found that there is not a single piece of experimental evidence that adding carbon dioxide to the Earth's atmosphere raises its temperature; the evidence is only models . Existence of contrary evidence and experimental physics : According to the iron rule of physics, a theory is false if experiment does not confirm it . Mention was made of a study that showed that adding CO2 does not completely change the temperature (conducted in Poland and published), which is deliberately concealed. The so-called "lunar experiment" was also cited to prove that increasing the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere does not change the absorption of thermal radiation . Criticism of ETS: It has been stated that CO2 charging schemes, such as the ETS, have no scientific basis and are an "incredible fraud" . Conjuncturalism in science and politics: The problem is that researchers who challenge the dominant CO2 doctrine do not receive grants, as only projects that support this narrative are funded . Politicians, on the other hand, are afraid to take a stand in public, probably for fear of ridicule or because they don't know the physics . Postulate for public debate: It has been pointed out that politicians need to organize a public debate, which should be broadcast in the media, in order to confront the arguments of experts from both sides. This is to enable citizens to understand the reality . The speculative nature of climate science: It has been recognized that much of climate research is based on numerical models and speculation, rather than actual physical measurements, so that results can be adjusted . Compared climate forecasting to the difficulty of accurately predicting the weather for more than a few hours.