Exclusively white people - and in the Middle East and Neolithic Europe. ZERO relationship with negroid people. Numerous lines of evidence indicate that European populations of Neolithic farmers were genetically very closely related to Neolithic groups from the Near East, especially Anatolia. PCA analyses have consistently placed samples of early European farmers (the so-called Early European Farmers Component, or EEF) alongside samples of ancient Anatolian farmers, and away from European hunter-gatherers. For example, samples of the Ribbon Pottery Culture (LBK) from Germany and other early farmers form a compact cloud on the PCA graph close to the axis of the Anatolian populations, reflecting their Anatolian origin. At the same time, these samples are clearly distant from Mesolithic HG clusters (e.g., western WHG), confirming the minimal contribution of indigenous genes in the early Neolithic phases. The f statistics further confirm this genetic proximity. The f4 values of f4(Mbuti, European_HG: Neolithic_European, Anatolia_Neolithic) showed that Neolithic Europeans share much more common genetic drift with Anatolian farmers than with any hunter-gatherer population of Europe. In other words, the genomes of the first European farmers show more similarity to those of Anatolian farmers than to those of local Mesolithic farmers, consistent with the migration model. The qpAdm mixing tests, meanwhile, allowed quantitative estimates of the proportions of the various components of ancestry. The models indicate that the early Neolithic populations of Europe can be described overwhelmingly as descendants of Anatolian farmers with only minor admixture from European HGs. For example, the genomes of early farmers from the LBK culture are typically modeled as about 70-95% Anatolia_Neolithic component plus a few to several percent WHG component. In the regions closest to Anatolia, this proportion was even almost 100% - studies indicate that the Neolithic population of the Balkans ~6000 BC had as much as ~98% of ancestry from Anatolian farmers and only ~2% from local hunter-gatherers. Such a high proportion of the Near Eastern genetic component provides strong evidence that the Neolithic spread by demic diffusion, i.e., with the migration of people carrying with them agricultural genes and lifestyles, rather than solely by cultural adoption by local communities. In subsequent millennia, there was a gradual increase in the admixture of hunter-gatherers in agricultural populations, reflecting local interactions after the initial stage of colonization. However, even in the younger phases of the Neolithic, farmers' genomes continued to be dominated by an Anatolian component. Thus, the people of the Cucuteni-Trypole culture (Chalcolithic in eastern Europe) were characterized by about 20% Mesolithic admixture, and the Late Neolithic cultures of central Europe (e.g., funnel cups, globular amphoras) by the order of 20-25% WHG. In western populations, such as on the Iberian Peninsula, this proportion may have reached ~50% by the end of the Neolithic, but still the rest of the genome originated in the Middle East. Even Neolithic British settlers (~4000 BC), who arrived relatively late, had about 75% Anatolian-agricultural ancestry and 25% hunter-gatherer ancestry, suggesting that much of this WHG admixture was "brought" by them from the continent (where earlier mixing occurred). The interpretation of these data is consistent: the dominance of the Anatolia_Neolithic component in the genomes of the first European farmers indicates an actual migration of the population from the Middle East, which almost completely replaced the gene pool of local hunter-gatherers in the first phase of the Neolithic. Only later - after several hundred years of coexistence - was there a gradual integration of indigenous genes into the gene pool of farmers. Estimates of the timing of the mixing of populations confirm this chronology: about 7,500 years ago (5,500 BC), the migration of Anatolian farmers to Europe took place, while significant admixtures of local HGs appeared about 1,000 years later, around 6200 BP (ca. 4,200 BC), giving rise to the diverse genes of local late Neolithic cultures. Along with this process, uniparental lineages also changed - early agricultural populations were dominated by haplogroups specific to the Near East (e.g., male G2a, female N1a, T, K), while haplogroups typical of European hunter-gatherers (Y-DNA I2, C1: mtDNA U5, U4) appear only in later periods and in small percentages. All of this genetic evidence - from PCA analyses to f4 statistics to qpAdm models - unequivocally supports the hypothesis that the development of the Neolithic in Europe was driven mainly by the migration of Anatolian populations, which brought with them both a new lifestyle and a different gene pool, rather than merely the transfer of ideas of plant cultivation and animal husbandry. At the same time, the subsequent increase in admixture from indigenous peoples indicates that interactions and assimilation between migrant farmers and local hunter-gatherer communities played an important role in shaping regional genetic variation in Neolithic Europe